Difference between revisions of "Q6"

From Viz Matters
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comments on the respondents' second most used visualisation tool.)
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
  
25 replies were given.
+
47 replies were given.
  
 
The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are:
 
The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are:
#[[gnuplot]] 4 replies
+
#[[gnuplot]] - 5 replies
#VMD 3 replies, but is not discussed in this section as the responses are extremely similar.
+
#[[Materials Studio]] - 3 replies
#[[Paraview]] 2 replies
+
#Matlab - 3 replies, but is not discussed in this section as the responses are the same as those in question 5.
#[[JMOL]] 2 replies
+
#[[Paraview]] - 3 replies
#[[VESTA]] 2 replies
+
#PyMol - 3 replies, also not discussed here.
#[[xmgrace]] 2 replies
+
#VMD - 3 replies, also not discussed here.
  
Other tools had no more than a single response.
+
Other tools that had two responses:
 +
#CCPN Analysis
 +
#Discovery Studio
 +
#IMOD
 +
#JMOL
 +
#Vesta
 +
#Visit
 +
#xmgrace
  
  
Line 19: Line 26:
 
====Overall====
 
====Overall====
 
A few observations can be drawn from these responses:
 
A few observations can be drawn from these responses:
#Users will prefer software that is written specifically for their domain of interest.
+
#Users seems to prefer software that is general purpose.
 
#Large datasets must be handled efficiently.
 
#Large datasets must be handled efficiently.
#Scripting or other ability to extend the tool is required.
+
#Good quality documentation/tutorials is required.
#Publication quality output is a valued bonus.
+
#Ability to read multiple formats is useful.

Latest revision as of 12:21, 30 January 2015

Comments on the respondents' second most used visualisation tool.

47 replies were given.

The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are:

  1. gnuplot - 5 replies
  2. Materials Studio - 3 replies
  3. Matlab - 3 replies, but is not discussed in this section as the responses are the same as those in question 5.
  4. Paraview - 3 replies
  5. PyMol - 3 replies, also not discussed here.
  6. VMD - 3 replies, also not discussed here.

Other tools that had two responses:

  1. CCPN Analysis
  2. Discovery Studio
  3. IMOD
  4. JMOL
  5. Vesta
  6. Visit
  7. xmgrace


Overall

A few observations can be drawn from these responses:

  1. Users seems to prefer software that is general purpose.
  2. Large datasets must be handled efficiently.
  3. Good quality documentation/tutorials is required.
  4. Ability to read multiple formats is useful.