Difference between revisions of "Q6"
From Viz Matters
Tim Morris (Talk | contribs) (→Comments on the respondents' second most used visualisation tool.) |
Tim Morris (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
− | + | 47 replies were given. | |
The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are: | The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are: | ||
− | #[[gnuplot]] | + | #[[gnuplot]] 5 replies |
#VMD 3 replies, but is not discussed in this section as the responses are extremely similar. | #VMD 3 replies, but is not discussed in this section as the responses are extremely similar. | ||
− | #[[Paraview]] | + | #Matlab 3 replies, but is not discussed in this section as the responses are extremely similar. |
+ | #[[Paraview]] 3 replies | ||
#[[JMOL]] 2 replies | #[[JMOL]] 2 replies | ||
#[[VESTA]] 2 replies | #[[VESTA]] 2 replies |
Revision as of 11:22, 24 November 2014
Comments on the respondents' second most used visualisation tool.
47 replies were given.
The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are:
- gnuplot 5 replies
- VMD 3 replies, but is not discussed in this section as the responses are extremely similar.
- Matlab 3 replies, but is not discussed in this section as the responses are extremely similar.
- Paraview 3 replies
- JMOL 2 replies
- VESTA 2 replies
- xmgrace 2 replies
Other tools had no more than a single response.
Overall
A few observations can be drawn from these responses:
- Users will prefer software that is written specifically for their domain of interest.
- Large datasets must be handled efficiently.
- Scripting or other ability to extend the tool is required.
- Publication quality output is a valued bonus.