Difference between revisions of "Q5"
From Viz Matters
Tim Morris (Talk | contribs) (→Comments on the respondents' most used visualisation tool.) |
Tim Morris (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are: | The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are: | ||
| − | #[[VMD]] 9 replies | + | #[[VMD]] - 9 replies |
| − | #[[MATLAB]] 6 replies | + | #[[MATLAB]] - 6 replies |
| − | #[[Avizo]] 5 replies | + | #[[Avizo]] - 5 replies |
| − | #[[Gimias]] 4 replies | + | #[[Gimias]] - 4 replies |
| − | #[[PyMol]] 4 replies | + | #[[PyMol]] - 4 replies |
Of the other tools, the major reasons for choosing them were: | Of the other tools, the major reasons for choosing them were: | ||
Revision as of 11:35, 24 November 2014
Comments on the respondents' most used visualisation tool.
91 replies were given.
The most commonly used tools, with links to answers are:
Of the other tools, the major reasons for choosing them were:
- ASE: quick and easy to use
- Avogadro: open source
- gnuplot: quick to use, scriptable
- ImageJ: free, easy, plugins
- Paraview: easy of use
Overall
A few observations can be drawn from these responses:
- Users will prefer software that is written specifically for their domain of interest.
- Large datasets must be handled efficiently.
- Scripting or other ability to extend the tool is required.
- Publication quality output is a valued bonus.
