ReportAndRecommendations - Revision history

Mcassdtm at 13:12, 30 January 2015

2015-01-30T13:12:59Z

Mcassdtm at 13:12, 30 January 2015

2015-01-30T13:12:03Z

Zzalsmt2: /* Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries: */

2015-01-30T13:09:01Z

‎Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries:

Zzalsmt2: /* WorkPackage Progress */

2015-01-30T13:07:27Z

‎WorkPackage Progress

Zzalsmt2: /* WorkPackage Progress */

2015-01-30T13:06:16Z

‎WorkPackage Progress

Mcassdtm: /* Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries: */

2015-01-30T13:05:28Z

‎Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries:

Zzalsmt2 at 13:03, 30 January 2015

2015-01-30T13:03:16Z

Zzalsmt2 at 21:04, 29 January 2015

2015-01-29T21:04:36Z

Zzalsmt2 at 20:55, 29 January 2015

2015-01-29T20:55:21Z

Zzalsmt2: /* Future Roadmap */

2015-01-29T20:44:38Z

‎Future Roadmap

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 #ParaView is high on the list of preferred visualisation tools. But gnuplot, Matlab, xmgrace, and Pgplot are also required.
 There are strong preferences to version number as features change. This may unify in the future.
 =Recommendations for a Future Vis Service=
 A future UK Vis-Service is worth exploring and a very worthy venture, but an obvious issue is the wide range and choice available of tools that any service would have to confront and support. Once all analysis is complete a list of discussion points that can be taken away will be placed here.
 =WorkPackage Progress=
@@ Line 82: / Line 86: @@
 # WP3 The currently unfunded CCPs were invited to attend and augmented these values, as well as supported alternative bids.
 # WP4 A final part in progress are certain software audits of other related organisations; including the German build IBM SuperMUC, two universities in Australia; visualisation suites at Curtin University and Australian National University and the Space applications Catapult.
 =Future Roadmap=

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 30 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries:=		=Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries:=
−	This pages give a summary of the conclusions of the global CCP survey (copied from the Main Page) plus summaries of the findings of the two smaller surveys of the CCPi and CFD communities.	+	This pages give a summary of the conclusions of the global CCP survey (copied from the Main Page) plus summaries of the findings of the two smaller surveys of the CCPi and CFD communities. We also make recommendations for the future support of visualisation services and suggest how these surveys might be repeated in the future to monitor progress.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 30 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries:=		=Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries:=
−	This pages give a summary of the conclusions of the global CCP survey (copied from the Main Page) plus summaries of the findings of ~~th etwo~~ smaller surveys of the CCPi and CFD communities.	+	This pages give a summary of the conclusions of the global CCP survey (copied from the Main Page) plus summaries of the findings of the two smaller surveys of the CCPi and CFD communities.

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 ## Fieldview
 ## Fiji
-## [[gunuplot]]
+## [[gnuplot]]
 ## IDL
 ## ImageJ

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 ## Amira
 ## atan
-## Avizo
+## [[Avizo]]
 ## Avogadro
 ## Chimera
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 ## Fieldview
 ## Fiji
-## gunuplot
+## [[gunuplot]]
 ## IDL
 ## ImageJ
@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 ## ITK/VTK
 ## Jmol
-## MATLAB
+## [[MATLAB]]
 ## Octave
 ## OMERO
 ## OpenCV
 ## Paraview
-## PyMol
+## [[PyMol]]
 ## R
 ## RasMol
@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 ## VisIT
 ## VGStudio Max
-## VMD
+## [[VMD]]
 ## VolView
 ## XCrySDen

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Summary list of Survey Executive Summaries:=
 ==For the Global CCP survey:==
@@ Line 32: / Line 34: @@
 #Visualisation is most important in analysis; but also useful in problem definition, and mesh generation.
 #ParaView is high on the list of preferred visualisation tools. But gnuplot, Matlab, xmgrace, and Pgplot are also required.
 There are strong preferences to version number as features change. This may unify in the future.
 =Recommendations for a Future Vis Service=

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 30 January 2015
Line 119:		Line 119:

	We are always open to taking on further studies and sub-studies, for other groups related to the CCP program.		We are always open to taking on further studies and sub-studies, for other groups related to the CCP program.
		+
		+
		+	==Authors==
		+
		+	Martin Turner [mailto:martin.turner@manchester.ac.uk email]
		+
		+	Ronald Fowler [mailto:ronald.fowler@stfc.ac.uk email]
		+
		+	Tim Morris [mailto:tim.morris@manchester.ac.uk email]
		+
		+
		+	We welcome feedback and also thank all those that gave indirect and direct contributions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 29 January 2015
Line 34:		Line 34:
	There are strong preferences to version number as features change. This may unify in the future.		There are strong preferences to version number as features change. This may unify in the future.

		+	=Recommendations for a Future Vis Service=
		+
		+	A future UK Vis-Service is worth exploring and a very worthy venture, but an obvious issue is the wide range and choice available of tools that any service would have to confront and support. Once all analysis is complete a list of discussion points that can be taken away will be placed here.

	=WorkPackage Progress=		=WorkPackage Progress=

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 We were asked to do four workpackages that are being developed and presented throughout this site.
-# WP1 We carried out an audit of the tools used and in a committee created a list of the common 35 packages for the range of CCPs. A further 30+ packages were mentioned in comments within the survey results. This in further work has been expanded to emphasise the long tail of tools available.
+# WP1 We carried out an audit of the tools used and in a committee created a list of the common 34 packages for the range of CCPs. A further 30+ packages were mentioned in comments within the survey results. This in further work has been expanded to emphasise the long tail of tools available.
 ## 3D Slicer
 ## Amira
@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 ## SciLib
 ## tecplot
 ## VisIT
 ## VGStudio Max
@@ Line 77: / Line 76: @@
 # WP2 User groups are very important as researchers and developers do not always associate CCP as their main motivation. The groups from the national facilities connected to STFC are included; DLS, ISIS and CLF. Other groups including the TSB (UK Innovate) Space Applications Catapult, RAL Space due to changing structure have been postponed for a future study. We also included CCPForge users directly: but only through news letters and a future study should directly address these users.
 # WP3 The currently unfunded CCPs were invited to attend and augmented these values, as well as supported alternative bids.
-# WP4 A final part in progress are certain software audits of other related organisations; including the German build IBM SuperMUC, two universities in Australia; visualisation suites at Curtin University and Australian National University and the Space applications CAtapult.
+# WP4 A final part in progress are certain software audits of other related organisations; including the German build IBM SuperMUC, two universities in Australia; visualisation suites at Curtin University and Australian National University and the Space applications Catapult.
 =Future Roadmap=
@@ Line 113: / Line 112: @@
 * CCP5 and CCP_EM as they embark on tomographic reconstruction and visualisation of 3D volumes in the next phase of CCP funding.
 * CCP-NC involvement in remote visualisation and web based visualisation with Jmol for example.  http://www.ccpnc.ac.uk/magresview/magresview/magres_view.html?JS
 * CCP_PET/MR, a new recently funded CCP, that has specific 4D visualisation needs including the addition of uncertainty visualisation to human based 3D scans.
 We are always open to taking on further studies and sub-studies, for other groups related to the CCP program.

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 . '''Global Comparison:''' We are in email contact with similar structures and have evaluated through the CCPi in particular specific tools from the Australian National University and Curtin University. Comparative study with audits are underway with these and at the German build IBM SuperMUC.
-We have started to look at a post-six month review to see where changes may have occurred; the first has complete with the CCPi initial survey. We have been also asked to look at future user communities:
+We have started to look at a post-six month review to see where changes may have occurred; the first has complete with the CCPi initial survey and further work will be undertaken. We have been also asked to look at future user communities:
 * CCP5 and CCP_EM as they embark on tomographic reconstruction and visualisation of 3D volumes in the next phase of CCP funding.
-* CCP-NC involvement in remote visualisation and web based visulation with Jmol for example.  http://www.ccpnc.ac.uk/magresview/magresview/magres_view.html?JS
+* CCP-NC involvement in remote visualisation and web based visualisation with Jmol for example.  http://www.ccpnc.ac.uk/magresview/magresview/magres_view.html?JS
 * CCP_PET/MR, a new recently funded CCP, that has specific 4D visualisation needs including the addition of uncertainty visualisation to human based 3D scans.
-We are always open to taking on studies and sub-studies, for other groups related to the CCP program.
+We are always open to taking on further studies and sub-studies, for other groups related to the CCP program.